Assessment

The complex case of Post-Qualification Admissions

Is technology the key to unlocking ‘post qualification’ reform to university admissions?

Date09/12/21

AuthorCharley Jarrett, Policy and Public Affairs Manager, AQA

Post-Qualification Admissions (PQA) would see university offers – or even applications to university – take place after students receive their A-level exam results.

Support for PQA reform stretches across the political spectrum, particularly among those with an interest in social mobility.

This is because PQA would help address concerns about the reliability of predicted and their effect on sub-groups of students. Historically, disadvantaged pupils are likely to apply for universities with entry requirements below their predicted grades. Research suggests this is due to a combination of personal pressure, low confidence as well as the appeal of lower universities providing unconditional offers and financial incentives, such as full or partly funded scholarships – which are typically more competitive across higher ranking universities.

In this context, it is argued the low reliability of predicted grades can have a disproportionate impact on disadvantaged and underrepresented students. Moving to a PQA system would also remove the issue of poor outcomes for disadvantaged students achieving higher than their predicted grades.

The big challenge for PQA reform, that has prevented successive governments from implementing it, is how to enable offers or applications to university to take place after A-level results day without causing havoc to schools and colleges, the exam system or universities. For the exam system, this risk relates to whether there is sufficient time for markers to mark scripts reliably, so that every student gets the grade they deserve.

Could technology be the key for unlocking PQA?

In debate on PQA, particular attention has focused on exam boards, and whether greater use of technology could dramatically shorten the amount of time required to complete marking and awarding – and in this way, enable PQA reform to happen.

However, exam scripts are scanned and digitised within days of leaving assembly halls and sport gyms – usually within 48 hours.

From that point onwards, the marking and awarding process is fully digital. The digitised content of student scripts is zipped through to examiners’ computers where the process of marking and awarding grades begins.

Long gone are the days when examiners received a jiffy bag full of scripts from across the country and set to work with red pens.

Put simply, there is very little time to be saved during marking and awarding each year through “technology” and making marking digital. Marking already is digital.

In future, the GCSE and A-level exam system is widely expected to move onscreen, away from pen and paper. However, this would only save a couple of days in the marking and awarding process, not the weeks – or months – required to enable implementation of a PQA system.

Some commentators have also suggested that artificial intelligence (AI) could be used to replace human markers in order to speed up the marking and awarding process.

Using AI to mark exams would certainly speed things up. However, this is still likely to be some years away. This means we need to work with what we have now.

In short, technology will not unlock the time savings in the exam system that will make the implementation of a PQA system radically easier. This is why, if PQA happens, centres, exam boards and universities will all have to adjust to substantial changes in the timetable of exams, marking and results days.

Assessment

Assessing oracy: Is Comparative Judgement the answer?

Oracy skills are vital to success in school and life. And yet, for many children, opportunities to develop them are missed. Educationalists are engaging in a growing debate about where oracy fits into the school system. Labour has put it at the heart of its plans to improve social mobility and an independent commission is looking at how it is taught in the classroom. This renewed focus on oracy means it is more important than ever that teachers have a way to reliably assess and understand their students’ attainment and progression. Amanda Moorghen of oracy education charity Voice 21 explains how Comparative Judgement can help with that and why it may be a game changer.

Education

TV subtitles as an aid to literacy: What does the research say?

Jack Black is probably best known in educational circles for playing a renegade substitute teacher in School of Rock. But the Hollywood star has made a more conventional foray into education by backing the use of TV subtitles to improve child literacy. Stephen Fry and the World Literacy Foundation also want parents to use their TV remotes to get children reading. So, could this simple click of a button be a solution to boost pupils’ reading skills? AQA’s resident expert on language teaching, Dr Katy Finch, casts her eye over the research to see whether it stacks up.

Data Analysis

What is left behind now education’s Data Wave has receded?

Is data the solution to all education’s issues? About a decade ago the prevailing wisdom said it was. Advocates of this Data Wave argued that harvesting internal statistics would help schools solve issues such as teacher accountability and attainment gaps. As with all waves, after crashing onto the beach they recede, leaving space for another to roll in. In this blog, teacher, author and data analyst Richard Selfridge looks at the legacy of the Data Wave to see what schools can take from it.

International Approaches

Finland & PISA – A fall from grace but still a high performer?

Finland was once recognised as one of the most successful educational systems in the world. At the turn of the millennium, it topped the PISA rankings in reading, maths and science. But by 2012, decline set in. The last set of results showed performances in maths, reading and science were at an all-time low. In this blog Dr Jonathan Doherty of Leeds Trinity University outlines some reasons that may account for the slide.

Briefing

PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS: What actually are they and what do they tell us?

According to the latest PISA results, England’s science scores are still on a downward trajectory that started a decade ago. Yet TIMSS, another respected study, has science performances rising. Which of them is right? Is one more valid than the other? In this blog AQi examines three International Large-Scale Assessments and finds that, although they may look the same from a distance, get up close and you’ll find they are very different beasts.

Adaptive Assessment

Adaptive Assessment: A missing ingredient in the resit recipe?

The number of students resitting their maths GCSE is growing, but the proportion getting a grade 4 or higher is falling. This situation is not only dispiriting for the young people striving to get the qualifications they need, but also for the teachers working hard to help them. How can outcomes for this cohort be improved? Bart Crisp, associate director at the Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education, thinks adaptive assessment may be part of the solution.

SEND

Student success: Every milestone matters

Baroness Morgan is calling for students to be given ‘self-belief’ lessons as a way of developing their characters and preparing them for the future. She is not the first to notice that a student’s sense of their own ability and their level of success are part of a virtuous circle. But how can teachers get the snowball rolling for students with SEND or in alternative provision? In this blog, former headteacher, John Tomsett, pulls out a swimming certificate he earned more than half a century ago to use as an inspiration for others.

Assessment

Progress 8 – How much can it flex?

Progress 8 has come in for criticism in recent months for the way it combines with the Ebacc to skew schools’ focus towards academic subjects at the expense of creative and technical options. Both Labour and a Lords committee have called for reform to boost uptake of declining subjects such as D&T, dance and drama. In the second of two blogs looking at Progress 8, AQi examines whether the accountability measure could be realigned to address these concerns and if so, how could that be done?

Assessment

Progress 8 – Schools’ flexible friend?

Eight years after Progress 8 came into existence it is facing calls to be updated. Some say reforming the schools accountability measure can halt the decline in take up of the arts, while others want it to boost numbers taking vocational and technical subjects. Are its shoulders broad enough to take on such a load? In the first of two blogs on Progress 8, AQi looks at how it came into being, what problems it was designed to solve and whether it is flexible enough to be reformed.

Assessment

2023: A year in review

As we wrap up a year full of exciting developments in education, it is the perfect time to take stock of what has gone on. In this blog, editor of AQi, Anil Dawar, reflects on some of his highlights for 2023.

Download a PDF version.

Download a copy of this content to your device as a PDF file. We generate PDF versions for the convenience of offline reading, but we recommend sharing this link if you'd like to send it to someone else.

The complex case of Post-Qualification Admissions

Could technology be the key for unlocking PQA?

Assessing oracy: Is Comparative Judgement the answer?

TV subtitles as an aid to literacy: What does the research say?

What is left behind now education’s Data Wave has receded?

Finland & PISA – A fall from grace but still a high performer?

PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS: What actually are they and what do they tell us?

Adaptive Assessment: A missing ingredient in the resit recipe?

Student success: Every milestone matters

Progress 8 – How much can it flex?

Progress 8 – Schools’ flexible friend?

2023: A year in review

Join the conversation on Twitter

Download a PDF version.

Sign up to our newsletter