Assessment

Assessing oracy: Is Comparative Judgement the answer?

Oracy skills are vital to success in school and life. And yet, for many children, opportunities to develop them are missed. Educationalists are engaging in a growing debate about where oracy fits into the school system. Labour has put it at the heart of its plans to improve social mobility and an independent commission is looking at how it is taught in the classroom. This renewed focus on oracy means it is more important than ever that teachers have a way to reliably assess and understand their students’ attainment and progression. Amanda Moorghen of oracy education charity Voice 21 explains how Comparative Judgement can help with that and why it may be a game changer.

Date18/04/24

AuthorAmanda Moorghen

Using Comparative Judgement to assess oracy: something to shout about?
Photo: Patrick Fore /Unsplash

Oracy is the ability to articulate ideas, develop understanding and engage with others through spoken language.

In school, it is a powerful learning tool.

Teaching students to become more effective speakers and listeners empowers them to better understand themselves, each other and the world around them.

Oracy is also a route to social mobility, empowering all, not just some, to find their voice for success in school and life.

Around the UK, hundreds of schools see it as a priority, so why is it not more valued in the heart of the education system?

It could be that there are other issues taking precedence such as staffing levels, budgetary demands or timetabling pressures.

Another reason could be that there is no national, standardised test for oracy.

Beyond the Early Years, we have no national statistics for oracy unlike literacy and numeracy.

As a result, teachers cannot reliably understand student attainment and progress in comparison to the national picture.

Those monitoring schools, whether in government, local authorities or MATs, lack the evidence needed to identify areas where support is needed or measure the effect of that support.

A key reason for lack of standardised testing is that historically, oracy has been considered “too subjective” to assess, particularly in high-stakes exams.

We have been looking at a solution for these issues with a pilot project using comparative judgement to assess and reliably score students.

Students are filmed completing a spoken assessment task, then those videos are shared with a nation-wide network of assessors – familiar with the Oracy Framework – who compare multiple videos , multiple times.

Videos are judged in pairs against a simple statement such as “choose the best explanation.”

This human assessment is fed into specialist software which combines them to create a rank order of all the performances

When assessing oracy, comparative judgement offers two significant benefits that help us reliably grade/score student performances.

First, it avoids the challenging task of describing which levels of performance should receive which marks. Instead of being compared to mark schemes, performances are ranked against each other.

Second, it tackles “subjectivity.”

Because each performance is assessed by multiple judges before the final rank is generated, moderation is in effect built in.

Our initial trials in around thirty schools used assessment tasks developed specifically for use with comparative judgement.

This approach yielded more reliable rankings of student work than we could have gained through existing methods.

The trials’ success led to a larger-scale pilot with Year 5 students which generated a national sample of oracy performances and informed our latest Impact Report.

It showed that students in our longest-standing oracy schools returned the higher performances.

There was a 50% increase in scores between students in first year oracy schools and those in fourth year oracy schools.

These findings will not only enable us to provide schools with much clearer guidance on what ‘good’ looks like, but also develop an assessment tool for schools to measure oracy attainment and progress in a national context.

This will raise the bar for oracy education by letting teachers and students see what “great” looks like and work towards that.

We believe this approach could be a game changer.

If comparative judgement is proven reliable and fair for assessing oracy, it enables an evidence-informed approach at all levels.

Teachers will be able to target support to those who need it most and ensure students progress as they move up the school.

Schools, trusts, local authorities and central government can identify and nurture best practice.

And students will be able to understand clearly how their oracy abilities are developing and value them as skills to be honed rather than fixed attributes.

Some major challenges remain to the widespread use of comparative judgement. When done on a large scale, it can be resource intensive, taking up lots of teachers’ valuable time.

However, Voice 21 is committed to working to develop the methodology and technology that is both robust and time efficient.

We think a new oracy assessment, powered by comparative judgement, is worth exploring as a way of ensuring every child receives the high-quality oracy education to which they are entitled.

Amanda Moorghen is Head of Learning, Impact and Policy at Voice 21 UK.
She has an MSc in Social Policy and Social Research from UCL’s Institute of Education.

As part of AQi’s work, we are inviting people from a wide range of viewpoints to engage with us on a wide range of topics. We welcome alternative views to help stimulate discussion and ideas. The views of external contributors do not necessarily represent the views of AQi or AQA.

Education Policy

Through the looking glass: How polling the public can help policymakers learn about themselves

Public attitude data is key to effective policymaking. Proper polling can reveal what people think about existing policies and what they want for the future. But, if looked at from a different angle, it can also help policymakers question themselves and their assumptions about the public. In this blog, AQA’s Policy and Evidence Manager Adam Steedman-Thake, reveals the lessons he learned about himself while reading a recent public attitude survey.

Assessment

Assessing oracy: Is Comparative Judgement the answer?

Education

TV subtitles as an aid to literacy: What does the research say?

Jack Black is probably best known in educational circles for playing a renegade substitute teacher in School of Rock. But the Hollywood star has made a more conventional foray into education by backing the use of TV subtitles to improve child literacy. Stephen Fry and the World Literacy Foundation also want parents to use their TV remotes to get children reading. So, could this simple click of a button be a solution to boost pupils’ reading skills? AQA’s resident expert on language teaching, Dr Katy Finch, casts her eye over the research to see whether it stacks up.

Data Analysis

What is left behind now education’s Data Wave has receded?

Is data the solution to all education’s issues? About a decade ago the prevailing wisdom said it was. Advocates of this Data Wave argued that harvesting internal statistics would help schools solve issues such as teacher accountability and attainment gaps. As with all waves, after crashing onto the beach they recede, leaving space for another to roll in. In this blog, teacher, author and data analyst Richard Selfridge looks at the legacy of the Data Wave to see what schools can take from it.

International Approaches

Finland & PISA – A fall from grace but still a high performer?

Finland was once recognised as one of the most successful educational systems in the world. At the turn of the millennium, it topped the PISA rankings in reading, maths and science. But by 2012, decline set in. The last set of results showed performances in maths, reading and science were at an all-time low. In this blog Dr Jonathan Doherty of Leeds Trinity University outlines some reasons that may account for the slide.

Briefing

PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS: What actually are they and what do they tell us?

According to the latest PISA results, England’s science scores are still on a downward trajectory that started a decade ago. Yet TIMSS, another respected study, has science performances rising. Which of them is right? Is one more valid than the other? In this blog AQi examines three International Large-Scale Assessments and finds that, although they may look the same from a distance, get up close and you’ll find they are very different beasts.

Adaptive Assessment

Adaptive Assessment: A missing ingredient in the resit recipe?

The number of students resitting their maths GCSE is growing, but the proportion getting a grade 4 or higher is falling. This situation is not only dispiriting for the young people striving to get the qualifications they need, but also for the teachers working hard to help them. How can outcomes for this cohort be improved? Bart Crisp, associate director at the Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education, thinks adaptive assessment may be part of the solution.

SEND

Student success: Every milestone matters

Baroness Morgan is calling for students to be given ‘self-belief’ lessons as a way of developing their characters and preparing them for the future. She is not the first to notice that a student’s sense of their own ability and their level of success are part of a virtuous circle. But how can teachers get the snowball rolling for students with SEND or in alternative provision? In this blog, former headteacher, John Tomsett, pulls out a swimming certificate he earned more than half a century ago to use as an inspiration for others.

Assessment

Progress 8 – How much can it flex?

Progress 8 has come in for criticism in recent months for the way it combines with the Ebacc to skew schools’ focus towards academic subjects at the expense of creative and technical options. Both Labour and a Lords committee have called for reform to boost uptake of declining subjects such as D&T, dance and drama. In the second of two blogs looking at Progress 8, AQi examines whether the accountability measure could be realigned to address these concerns and if so, how could that be done?

Assessment

Progress 8 – Schools’ flexible friend?

Eight years after Progress 8 came into existence it is facing calls to be updated. Some say reforming the schools accountability measure can halt the decline in take up of the arts, while others want it to boost numbers taking vocational and technical subjects. Are its shoulders broad enough to take on such a load? In the first of two blogs on Progress 8, AQi looks at how it came into being, what problems it was designed to solve and whether it is flexible enough to be reformed.

Download a PDF version.

Download a copy of this content to your device as a PDF file. We generate PDF versions for the convenience of offline reading, but we recommend sharing this link if you'd like to send it to someone else.

Assessing oracy: Is Comparative Judgement the answer?

Through the looking glass: How polling the public can help policymakers learn about themselves

Assessing oracy: Is Comparative Judgement the answer?

TV subtitles as an aid to literacy: What does the research say?

What is left behind now education’s Data Wave has receded?

Finland & PISA – A fall from grace but still a high performer?

PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS: What actually are they and what do they tell us?

Adaptive Assessment: A missing ingredient in the resit recipe?

Student success: Every milestone matters

Progress 8 – How much can it flex?

Progress 8 – Schools’ flexible friend?

Join the conversation on Twitter

Download a PDF version.

Sign up to our newsletter