Assessment

The Birth of GCSEs: Four decades on, what were the reasons for GCSEs?

With the exam season nearing its end, Andrew Taylor, AQA’s Head of Mathematics, outlines the reasons why GCSEs were created.

Date21/06/22

AuthorAndrew Taylor, Head of Mathematics, AQA

In the summer of 2022, young people all over the country will be sitting GCSE exams for the first time in three years. The absence of this milestone in our education system has led many to reflect on the continuing relevance of GCSEs and consider what- if anything- should replace it.

Therefore, now feels like the opportune time to look back to the birth of GCSE in the late 1980’s, and to remind ourselves of the assessment and qualifications landscape that existed before it.

What did we have before GCSEs?

Prior to GCSEs' introduction, there were two formats of national examination at age 16. The General Certificate of Education at Ordinary level, or O-level, had existed since 1951. These qualifications were administered by the exam boards, largely associated with universities, that also offered A-levels. Furthermore, they were targeted at high-attaining students (typically 20% of the entire cohort).

The Certificate of Secondary Education (CSE) had been available for a number of years with the aim of offering qualifications suitable for the next 40% of the cohort. Contrary to O-levels, CSEs were administered by regional bodies; unlike O-levels, schools had no choice of awarding body.

This two-tier exams framework reflected the broader education system of the time. O-levels were perceived to be qualifications for students attending selective (grammar and fee-paying) schools. Comparatively, CSEs were taken by secondary modern students who ‘stayed on’ into a fifth year of secondary education whilst many of their peers left at 15 with few, if any, qualifications.

Why did we move to one exam for all?

The amount of choice available to teachers and students was often bewildering. For example, in 1978 the Joint Matriculation Board (JMB, forerunner of AQA) offered 13 maths and additional maths O-levels with the number of young people entering each ranging from 1 to 27,000.

Furthermore, there was a significant variation of ‘mode 3’ CSE qualifications. Mode 3 CSEs were devised and operated by schools, with the results being moderated and approved by the regional board. A school could design an assessment, define content that best suited their students, and the local exam board would approve it and award grades.

To attempt some form of standardisation, the numerous exam boards used a norm-referencing approach when awarding qualifications. This meant that roughly the same proportion of students achieved each grade across years, subjects and boards. Broadly speaking, the system was designed so that around 60% of those entered achieved a pass grade at O- level.

However; with so much variety on offer and a lack of standardisation of curricula, there was a lot of variation between what a C in O-Level Maths, or any other subject, represented.

Times changed, so did exams.

The education landscape in England rapidly transformed during the 1970s. By mid-decade, GCE and CSE exam boards were working together on 16+ exams, essentially a single exam with a dual grading system. In most areas, comprehensive schools had replaced grammars and secondary moderns and the 11+ had all-but disappeared.

At the end of the decade, a sizable majority of 16 year olds sat some form of exam, and most of these young people were educated in a comprehensive system. The old model of a two-tier system of qualifications was no longer appropriate and calls for a single exam system had grown exceptionally louder.

So, what were the expectations for GCSE at its inception?

GCSEs were intended as the principle qualification sat by the majority of students at 16 that assessed their skills on a breadth of topics. They were to be criterion-referenced and stressed equality of opportunity by ensuring students were assessed on subject content to the same standard and at the same level of difficulty (with the exception of tiered papers).

A final thought is that we should recognise the significant achievements of students and their teachers in rising to whatever challenges the exams system of the day gives them. Whether now or forty years ago, national qualifications are hard-earned and richly deserved, and should be celebrated.

Everyone at AQi would like to wish all students the very best of luck with their exams.

Assessment

Assessing oracy: Is Comparative Judgement the answer?

Oracy skills are vital to success in school and life. And yet, for many children, opportunities to develop them are missed. Educationalists are engaging in a growing debate about where oracy fits into the school system. Labour has put it at the heart of its plans to improve social mobility and an independent commission is looking at how it is taught in the classroom. This renewed focus on oracy means it is more important than ever that teachers have a way to reliably assess and understand their students’ attainment and progression. Amanda Moorghen of oracy education charity Voice 21 explains how Comparative Judgement can help with that and why it may be a game changer.

Education

TV subtitles as an aid to literacy: What does the research say?

Jack Black is probably best known in educational circles for playing a renegade substitute teacher in School of Rock. But the Hollywood star has made a more conventional foray into education by backing the use of TV subtitles to improve child literacy. Stephen Fry and the World Literacy Foundation also want parents to use their TV remotes to get children reading. So, could this simple click of a button be a solution to boost pupils’ reading skills? AQA’s resident expert on language teaching, Dr Katy Finch, casts her eye over the research to see whether it stacks up.

Data Analysis

What is left behind now education’s Data Wave has receded?

Is data the solution to all education’s issues? About a decade ago the prevailing wisdom said it was. Advocates of this Data Wave argued that harvesting internal statistics would help schools solve issues such as teacher accountability and attainment gaps. As with all waves, after crashing onto the beach they recede, leaving space for another to roll in. In this blog, teacher, author and data analyst Richard Selfridge looks at the legacy of the Data Wave to see what schools can take from it.

International Approaches

Finland & PISA – A fall from grace but still a high performer?

Finland was once recognised as one of the most successful educational systems in the world. At the turn of the millennium, it topped the PISA rankings in reading, maths and science. But by 2012, decline set in. The last set of results showed performances in maths, reading and science were at an all-time low. In this blog Dr Jonathan Doherty of Leeds Trinity University outlines some reasons that may account for the slide.

Briefing

PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS: What actually are they and what do they tell us?

According to the latest PISA results, England’s science scores are still on a downward trajectory that started a decade ago. Yet TIMSS, another respected study, has science performances rising. Which of them is right? Is one more valid than the other? In this blog AQi examines three International Large-Scale Assessments and finds that, although they may look the same from a distance, get up close and you’ll find they are very different beasts.

Adaptive Assessment

Adaptive Assessment: A missing ingredient in the resit recipe?

The number of students resitting their maths GCSE is growing, but the proportion getting a grade 4 or higher is falling. This situation is not only dispiriting for the young people striving to get the qualifications they need, but also for the teachers working hard to help them. How can outcomes for this cohort be improved? Bart Crisp, associate director at the Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education, thinks adaptive assessment may be part of the solution.

SEND

Student success: Every milestone matters

Baroness Morgan is calling for students to be given ‘self-belief’ lessons as a way of developing their characters and preparing them for the future. She is not the first to notice that a student’s sense of their own ability and their level of success are part of a virtuous circle. But how can teachers get the snowball rolling for students with SEND or in alternative provision? In this blog, former headteacher, John Tomsett, pulls out a swimming certificate he earned more than half a century ago to use as an inspiration for others.

Assessment

Progress 8 – How much can it flex?

Progress 8 has come in for criticism in recent months for the way it combines with the Ebacc to skew schools’ focus towards academic subjects at the expense of creative and technical options. Both Labour and a Lords committee have called for reform to boost uptake of declining subjects such as D&T, dance and drama. In the second of two blogs looking at Progress 8, AQi examines whether the accountability measure could be realigned to address these concerns and if so, how could that be done?

Assessment

Progress 8 – Schools’ flexible friend?

Eight years after Progress 8 came into existence it is facing calls to be updated. Some say reforming the schools accountability measure can halt the decline in take up of the arts, while others want it to boost numbers taking vocational and technical subjects. Are its shoulders broad enough to take on such a load? In the first of two blogs on Progress 8, AQi looks at how it came into being, what problems it was designed to solve and whether it is flexible enough to be reformed.

Assessment

2023: A year in review

As we wrap up a year full of exciting developments in education, it is the perfect time to take stock of what has gone on. In this blog, editor of AQi, Anil Dawar, reflects on some of his highlights for 2023.

Download a PDF version.

Download a copy of this content to your device as a PDF file. We generate PDF versions for the convenience of offline reading, but we recommend sharing this link if you'd like to send it to someone else.

The Birth of GCSEs: Four decades on, what were the reasons for GCSEs?

What did we have before GCSEs?

Why did we move to one exam for all?

Times changed, so did exams.

Assessing oracy: Is Comparative Judgement the answer?

TV subtitles as an aid to literacy: What does the research say?

What is left behind now education’s Data Wave has receded?

Finland & PISA – A fall from grace but still a high performer?

PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS: What actually are they and what do they tell us?

Adaptive Assessment: A missing ingredient in the resit recipe?

Student success: Every milestone matters

Progress 8 – How much can it flex?

Progress 8 – Schools’ flexible friend?

2023: A year in review

Join the conversation on Twitter

Download a PDF version.

Sign up to our newsletter